Right now I don't know that there will be any riots just yet, they are likely hoping the DOJ can give them what they want.
I'm not 100% sure what they're trying for, but I believe they're trying to get him on the weapons charge that the judge dismissed.
As far as the evidence I have seen he was 100% within the law for possessing this rifle because in Wisconsin a 17 year old can posses a long gun as long as it is not an NFA item.
It was not a short barreled rifle or a short barreled shotgun, so he was completely within the law and as per the judge's understanding as such he dismissed that charge.
I don't know what the DOJ hopes to achieve, but I've heard they'd want it held in another part of Wisconsin so they can get a jury more suitable to finding him guilty on what they planning on some kind of federal charges.
I sure hope that doesn't go anywhere.
I may be naive in this whole thing, but I really just cannot phathom why anyone would choose to ignore the obvious facts and evidence.
A white kid shot 3 very bad white men, the only hint of race angle they can find is to say he only got a fair shake because he's white.
They say if he was black he'd have been shot by the cops or something, and of course they would not feel the same way about him that they do about Kyle.
Of he was black he wouldn't have gotten a fair shake.
What about tht drug dealing thug from Texas who shot 4 people at school ?
Got out on bail, went home to a party his parents threw him, and his parents got on the news crying self defense.
If he was black? That kid is black and got what they claim you only get if you're white.